Orthogonal Thinking

Tag: DevSecOps best practices

  • Securing Kubernetes Supply Chains with SBOM & Sigstore

    Securing Kubernetes Supply Chains with SBOM & Sigstore

    Explore a production-proven, security-first approach to Kubernetes supply chain security using SBOMs and Sigstore, ensuring robust DevSecOps practices.

    Understanding the Modern Software Supply Chain Risks

    It was a quiet Monday morning—or so I thought. Our team was wrapping up a sprint when a critical vulnerability alert popped up in Slack. A third-party container image we’d been using for months had been compromised, and attackers were embedding malicious code into the supply chain. Suddenly, every Kubernetes cluster running that image was a potential attack vector.

    Supply chain attacks like this are becoming alarmingly common. From the infamous SolarWinds breach to compromised Docker images on public registries, attackers are targeting the weakest links in the software supply chain. Kubernetes environments, with their reliance on container images, open-source dependencies, and CI/CD pipelines, are particularly vulnerable.

    Traditional security measures—firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and even vulnerability scanners—often fall short in addressing these risks. Why? Because they focus on runtime security, not the integrity of the software artifacts themselves. This is where supply chain security comes in.

    What is SBOM and Why It Matters

    Before we dive into solutions, let’s talk about SBOM—Software Bill of Materials. Think of it as a detailed inventory of everything that makes up your software: dependencies, libraries, container images, and even the tools used to build it.

    Why does this matter? Because modern software is a patchwork of third-party components. Without visibility into what’s inside, you’re flying blind when vulnerabilities are discovered. SBOM provides transparency, enabling you to:

    • Identify vulnerable dependencies early.
    • Track the origin of components to ensure they’re trustworthy.
    • Comply with regulations like the U.S. Executive Order on Cybersecurity.

    💡 Pro Tip: Generate SBOMs automatically during your CI/CD pipeline. Tools like syft and cyclonedx make this easy.

    Introducing Sigstore: Simplifying Artifact Signing

    Now that we’ve covered SBOM, let’s talk about Sigstore. If SBOM is the inventory, Sigstore is the security guard ensuring no tampered goods make it into your warehouse.

    Sigstore is an open-source project designed to simplify signing and verifying software artifacts. It ensures the integrity and authenticity of your container images, binaries, and other build outputs. Here’s how it works:

    • Cosign: A tool for signing container images and verifying their signatures.
    • Rekor: A transparency log that records signed artifacts for auditability.
    • Fulcio: A certificate authority for issuing signing certificates.

    🔐 Security Note: Sigstore eliminates the need for manual key management by using ephemeral keys and transparency logs. This reduces the risk of key compromise.

    Implementing a Security-First Approach in Production

    Let’s get practical. Here’s how you can integrate SBOM and Sigstore into your Kubernetes pipelines:

    💡 Hardware Recommendation: For enhanced security and monitoring, consider investing in quality hardware like the YubiKey 5C NFC (~$55-70) or NETGEAR Nighthawk Pro Gaming XR1000 (~$200-250). These tools can significantly improve your workflow and productivity.

    Step 1: Generate SBOMs

    Use tools like syft to generate SBOMs for your container images:

    # Generate an SBOM for a container image
syft docker-image:your-image:latest -o cyclonedx-json > sbom.json
            
    

    💡 Pro Tip: Automate SBOM generation in your CI/CD pipeline to ensure every build is covered.
    

    Step 2: Sign Artifacts with Sigstore
    

    Use cosign to sign your container images:
    

    # Sign a container image
cosign sign --key key-file your-image:latest
            
    

    Store the signature in Rekor for auditability:
    

    # Upload signature to Rekor
cosign upload your-image:latest
            
    

    ⚠️ Gotcha: Ensure your CI/CD pipeline has access to the signing keys securely. Use tools like HashiCorp Vault or AWS Secrets Manager.
    

    Step 3: Verify Signatures
    

    Before deploying, verify the integrity of your artifacts:
    

    # Verify a container image
cosign verify your-image:latest
            
    

    🔐 Security Note: Always verify signatures in production environments. Never deploy unsigned artifacts.
    

    Future of Supply Chain Security in Kubernetes
    

    The landscape of Kubernetes supply chain security is evolving rapidly. Here are some trends to watch:
    

      

    • Adoption of SBOM standards like CycloneDX and SPDX.
      • 

    • Integration of Sigstore with popular CI/CD tools.
      • 

    • Emergence of AI-driven tools for detecting supply chain anomalies.
      • 

    

    Open-source communities are playing a critical role here. Projects like Sigstore, Trivy, and Harbor are pushing the boundaries of what’s possible in DevSecOps.
    

    💡 Pro Tip: Stay ahead by participating in these communities and keeping an eye on emerging tools.
    

    Key Takeaways
    

      

    • Supply chain attacks are a growing threat in Kubernetes environments.
      • 

    • SBOM provides transparency into software components, enabling early vulnerability detection.
      • 

    • Sigstore simplifies artifact signing and verification, ensuring integrity and authenticity.
      • 

    • Integrate SBOM and Sigstore into your CI/CD pipelines for a security-first approach.
      • 

    • The future of supply chain security lies in open-source collaboration and automation.
      • 

    

    Have a story about supply chain security gone wrong? Share it with me—I’d love to hear it. Next week, we’ll explore securing Kubernetes secrets with external vaults. Stay tuned!
  • GitOps Security Patterns for Kubernetes at Scale

    GitOps Security Patterns for Kubernetes at Scale

    Description: Explore production-proven GitOps security patterns that prioritize a security-first approach for Kubernetes and DevSecOps environments.

    Introduction to GitOps and Security Challenges

    It was a quiet Wednesday afternoon—or so I thought. I was reviewing a GitOps pipeline when I noticed something odd: a commit had been pushed directly to the main branch without a pull request. Worse, the commit introduced a misconfigured Kubernetes resource that opened up an entire cluster to the internet. The fallout? A frantic scramble to revoke credentials and patch the security hole before attackers found it.

    GitOps, at its core, is a powerful paradigm for managing Kubernetes clusters declaratively through Git repositories. But with great power comes great responsibility. The same workflows that make GitOps efficient can also introduce security risks if not properly managed. Misconfigured RBAC, leaked secrets, and unverified code changes are just a few of the common challenges teams face.

    Adopting a security-first mindset in GitOps workflows isn’t just a best practice—it’s a necessity. Let’s dive into how you can secure GitOps at scale without losing sleep over production incidents.

    Core Principles of Secure GitOps

    Before we get into specific patterns, let’s establish the foundational principles of secure GitOps:

    • Immutability: All configurations should be declarative and version-controlled, ensuring changes are tracked and reversible.
    • Least Privilege Access: Use Kubernetes RBAC to enforce strict access controls. No one should have more permissions than they need.
    • Auditability: Every change in your GitOps pipeline should be traceable—who made the change, when, and why.

    These principles are the bedrock of secure GitOps workflows. Let’s explore how to implement them in practice.

    Production-Tested Security Patterns for GitOps

    1. Signed Commits and Verifying Signatures

    One of the simplest ways to ensure trusted code is by using signed commits. This ensures that every change in your Git repository comes from an authenticated source.

    
# Example: Verifying signed commits in Git
git log --show-signature
# Output will confirm whether the commit was signed and by whom

    🔐 Security Note: Require signed commits in your repositories by enabling Git’s commit.gpgSign configuration and enforcing it in CI pipelines.

    2. Automated Vulnerability Scanning

    Integrate vulnerability scanning into your CI/CD pipeline to catch issues before they reach production. Tools like Trivy and Snyk can scan container images and dependencies for known vulnerabilities.

    
# Example: Scanning a container image with Trivy
trivy image my-app:latest
# Output will list vulnerabilities, their severity, and remediation steps

    💡 Pro Tip: Schedule regular scans for your base images and dependencies, even if they haven’t changed. Vulnerabilities can be discovered long after code is written.

    💡 Hardware Recommendation: For a reliable homelab setup, consider investing in quality hardware like the Raspberry Pi 5 (~$75-85) or Synology DS224+ NAS (~$350-400). These tools can significantly improve your workflow and productivity.

    3. Secrets Management Best Practices

    Never store secrets directly in Git repositories. Use tools like HashiCorp Vault or Kubernetes Secrets with encryption enabled.

    
# Example: Creating an encrypted Kubernetes Secret
kubectl create secret generic my-secret --from-literal=key=value --dry-run=client -o yaml | kubectl apply -f -

    ⚠️ Gotcha: Kubernetes Secrets are base64-encoded, not encrypted by default. Always enable encryption at rest in your cluster configuration.

    Monitoring and Incident Response in GitOps

    Even the most secure GitOps workflows need monitoring and incident response plans. Here’s how to stay ahead of potential issues:

    • Real-Time Monitoring: Use tools like Prometheus and Grafana to monitor GitOps workflows for anomalies.
    • Unauthorized Changes: Set up alerts for direct pushes to protected branches or unexpected changes in Kubernetes resources.
    • Incident Response Playbooks: Integrate GitOps workflows into your incident response plans. For example, roll back to a previous commit if a misconfiguration is detected.

    🔐 Security Note: Enable Kubernetes audit logs to track API requests and detect unauthorized access attempts.

    Best Practices for Scaling Secure GitOps

    Scaling GitOps securely across multiple clusters requires standardization and automation:

    • Standardize Security Policies: Use tools like Open Policy Agent (OPA) to enforce consistent policies across clusters.
    • Policy-as-Code: Define security policies as code and version-control them alongside your application configurations.
    • Continuous Improvement: Conduct regular post-mortems and security reviews to identify gaps and improve workflows.

    💡 Pro Tip: Use GitOps to manage cluster-wide configurations like Pod Security Standards (PSS) and network policies.

    Conclusion and Key Takeaways

    Securing GitOps workflows is not a one-time effort—it’s an ongoing process that requires vigilance and a proactive mindset. Here’s what to remember:

    • Signed commits and vulnerability scanning are essential for trusted code.
    • Secrets management should prioritize encryption and avoid Git storage.
    • Monitor workflows and integrate incident response plans for rapid recovery.
    • Standardize security policies across clusters using tools like OPA.

    Ready to level up your GitOps security game? Dive into resources like the Kubernetes documentation and tools like Flux and ArgoCD.

    Got a GitOps horror story or a tip I missed? Drop a comment or ping me on Twitter—I’d love to hear it. Remember: security isn’t optional, it’s foundational.

  • Kubernetes Pod Security Standards for Production

    Kubernetes Pod Security Standards for Production

    Description: Explore a production-tested, security-first approach to implementing Kubernetes Pod Security Standards, ensuring robust DevSecOps practices.

    Introduction to Kubernetes Pod Security Standards

    It was a quiet Thursday afternoon—or so I thought. I was reviewing logs when I noticed something odd: a privileged container running in our production cluster. Turns out, someone had deployed it with overly permissive settings during a rushed release. That single misstep could have been catastrophic if exploited. This is why Kubernetes Pod Security Standards (PSS) are non-negotiable in production environments.

    Pod Security Standards are Kubernetes’ way of enforcing security policies at the pod level. They define what pods can and cannot do, ensuring your cluster isn’t a playground for attackers. But here’s the catch: implementing PSS correctly requires more than just flipping a switch. It demands thoughtful planning, testing, and integration into your DevSecOps workflows.

    Understanding the Three Pod Security Modes

    Kubernetes Pod Security Standards offer three modes: Privileged, Baseline, and Restricted. Each mode serves a different purpose, and understanding them is key to securing your cluster.

    • Privileged: The “anything goes” mode. Pods have unrestricted access to host resources, which is great for debugging but a nightmare for security. Avoid this in production.
    • Baseline: The middle ground. It restricts dangerous capabilities like host networking but allows common configurations. Suitable for most workloads.
    • Restricted: The gold standard for security. It enforces strict policies, preventing privilege escalation, host access, and unsafe configurations. Ideal for sensitive workloads.

    🔐 Security Note: Always aim for Restricted mode in production unless you have a compelling reason to use Baseline. Privileged mode should only be used for debugging or testing in isolated environments.

    Implementing Pod Security Standards in Production

    Applying PSS policies in a real-world Kubernetes cluster can be challenging, but it’s worth the effort. Here’s how to do it:

    Step 1: Define Your Policies

    Start by defining Pod Security Standards in YAML files. For example:

    apiVersion: policy/v1
kind: PodSecurityPolicy
metadata:
  name: restricted
spec:
  privileged: false
  allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
  requiredDropCapabilities:
    - ALL
  volumes:
    - 'configMap'
    - 'emptyDir'
    - 'secret'
    

    This policy enforces the Restricted mode, ensuring pods can’t escalate privileges or access the host.
    

    Step 2: Apply Policies to Namespaces
    

    Assign policies to namespaces based on workload sensitivity. For example:
    

    kubectl label namespace production pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce=restricted
    

    

    ⚠️ Gotcha: Don’t forget to test policies in staging before applying them to production. Misconfigured policies can break workloads.
    

    

    Step 3: Monitor Policy Violations
    

    Use tools like kubectl or Gatekeeper to monitor compliance:
    

    kubectl get pods --namespace production --field-selector=status.phase!=Running
    

    

    💡 Pro Tip: Automate compliance checks using Open Policy Agent (OPA). It integrates seamlessly with Kubernetes and CI/CD pipelines.
    

    

    Integrating PSS with DevSecOps Workflows
    

    To make PSS enforcement scalable, integrate it into your DevSecOps workflows. Here’s how:
    

    Automate PSS Enforcement
    

    Use CI/CD pipelines to validate policies before deployment. For example:
    

    # Example CI/CD pipeline step
steps:
  - name: Validate Pod Security Policies
    run: |
      kubectl apply --dry-run=client -f pod-security-policy.yaml
    

    Audit Policies Regularly
    

    Set up periodic audits to ensure compliance. Tools like Kubernetes Audit Logs can help.
    

    Lessons from Production: Real-World Insights
    

    Over the years, I’ve seen teams struggle with PSS adoption. Here are some lessons learned:
    

      

    • Start small: Apply policies to non-critical namespaces first.
      • 

    • Communicate: Educate developers on why PSS matters.
      • 

    • Iterate: Review and refine policies regularly.
      • 

    

    

    🔐 Security Note: Never assume your policies are perfect. Threats evolve, and so should your security standards.
    

    

    Conclusion and Next Steps
    

    Here’s what to remember:
    

      

    • Pod Security Standards are critical for securing Kubernetes clusters.
      • 

    • Restricted mode should be your default for production workloads.
      • 

    • Integrate PSS enforcement into your DevSecOps workflows for scalability.
      • 

    

    Want to dive deeper? Check out Kubernetes Pod Security Standards documentation or explore tools like OPA and Gatekeeper.
    

    Have a story about implementing PSS in production? Share it with me on Twitter or drop a comment below. Next week, we’ll explore Kubernetes network policies—because securing pods is only half the battle.
Home · About · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service
© 2026 Orthogonal Info. All rights reserved.